You are here: Home Action Alerts
CAIR-CAN: Demand Change to Security Certifcate Process
(OTTAWA, CANADA - 8/11/2004) - CAIR-CAN is calling on all Canadians of
conscience to demand that our government overhaul the current security
certificate process to make it comply with international human rights
The call marks the first hearing in the Federal Court of Appeal of Adil
Charkaoui's (an individual held under the process) constitutional challenge
to the security certificate process.
Security certificates have been soundly condemned by human rights and
social justice advocates. Recently, more than 60 law experts and legal
associations in Canada, including the Canadian Bar Association, sent a
letter to the Minister of Public Safety Anne McLellan to express their
grave concerns with the legal process of security certificates.
HOW DO SECURITY CERTIFICATES WORK?
The process begins with the Solicitor-General and the Minister of
Citizenship and Immigration signing a security certificate alleging that a
non-citizen presents a risk to national security.
The person may then be immediately arrested and jailed, often for years, as
the government takes steps to seek his or her removal.
Currently, there are at least five people in Canada - all Arabs or Muslims
- who have been subject to security-certificate procedures on the basis of
alleged links to terrorism: Muhammad Mahjoub (since June, 2000); Mahmoud
Jaballah (August, 2001); Hassan Almrei (October, 2001); Mohamed Harkat
(December, 2002); and Adil Charkaoui (May, 2003).
The court process of reviewing the certificates is held in secret. Our
government is not required to disclose the precise nature of the
allegations; and normal rules of evidence are dispensed with, including the
right to cross-examine witnesses and to challenge evidence obtained through
normally unacceptable means, such as hearsay or even torture.
Without knowing and being able to challenge the specific allegations and
evidence against a person, it is nearly impossible to mount an accurate,
People held under security certificates can be deported to face torture.
VOICE your concerns about the security certificate process by calling or
e-mailing the following Ministers:
Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Telephone: (613) 992-4524
Fax (613) 943-0044
E-mail: [email protected]
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Telephone: (613) 992-7774
Fax (613) 947-8319
E-mail: [email protected]
Minister of Justice
Telephone: (613) 995-0121
Fax (613) 992-6762
E-mail: [email protected]
* That the five individuals held under security certificates be either
released or given a fair trial in accordance with international human
* That the individuals not be deported. Amnesty International has
recognized that all five face torture and human rights abuses if deported.
* That the security certificate process be overhauled to make it comply
with international human rights standards.
COPY [email protected] on your correspondence
Council on American-Islamic Relations CANADA
P.O. Box 13219, Ottawa, ONT, K2K 1X4
Help CAIR Meet its Goal of $1 Million
Alhamdulillah (praise be to God), CAIR raised almost $900,000 in its
Ramadan campaign. With only $102,912 left, we are asking everyone to do
their part to help us reach our goal! Whether your donation is $50 or $100,
every dollar that you donate today will count and be used to help empower
the American Muslim community.
We need about 1000 people to donate $100 to meet our goal!
NOW is the time to show your support for CAIR.
To support CAIR's important work, please donate at:
REMEMBER: Scholars say CAIR is able to receive ZAKAT donations.
Palestinians Called 'Stinking Animals' on MSNBC's 'Imus'
(WASHINGTON, D.C., 11/18/04) – A prominent national Islamic civil rights
and advocacy group today called for an apology from the MSNBC cable
television network over comments on its "Imus in the Morning" program that
referred to Palestinians as "stinking animals" and suggested that they all be
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) also
urged that the program's host, Don Imus, be reprimanded for failing to
challenge his colleagues’ inflammatory remarks. CAIR, which says it
received numerous complaints about the comments, quoted a transcript of
Imus’ November 12th program in which he and his on-air colleagues engaged
in the following discussion about live coverage of Palestinian President
Yasser Arafat's funeral:
DON IMUS: They're (the Palestinians) eating dirt and that fat pig wife of
his is living in Paris.
COLLEAGUE: They’re all brainwashed, though. That’s what it is. And they're
stupid, to begin with, but they’re brainwashed now. Stinking animals. They
ought to drop the bomb right there, kill 'em all right now…
IMUS: Well, the problem is we have (reporter) Andrea (Mitchell) there; we
don't want anything to happen to her.
COLLEAGUE: Oh, she's got to get out. Andrea, get out and then drop the bomb
and kill everybody…
COLLEAGUE: Look at this. Animals. Animals!
In a letter to MSNBC President Neal Shapiro, CAIR stated: "We are firm
defenders of the First Amendment, but these hate-filled and racist remarks
can only serve to legitimize anti-Muslim and anti-Arab bigotry in our
society and could lead to further discrimination against members of the
Islamic and Arab-American communities." (CAIR also filed a complaint with
the FCC because "Imus in the Morning" is a nationally-syndicated radio
This is not the first time Imus has been involved in a controversy over
anti-Arab and Islamophobic remarks. As early as 1985, he was forced to
apologize for referring to Arabs as "goat-humping weasels." (Sunday Mail,
4/21/85) He has also been criticized for using the derogatory term
"raghead." (Accuracy in Media) In a reference to the crash of an Iranian
airliner earlier this year that killed 43 passengers, Imus said, "When I
hear stories like that, I think who cares.” He then stated: "Too bad it
wasn't full of Saudi Arabians." (National Iranian American Council)
Earlier this year, CAIR announced a campaign designed to counter hate
speech on talk radio. The campaign, called "Hate Hurts America," is based
on the premise that the increasing attacks on Islam by talk show hosts harm
the United States by creating a downward spiral of interfaith mistrust and
hostility. As part of that campaign, Muslims were given step-by-step
instructions on how to monitor local and syndicated radio programs, report
anti-Muslim hate, file FCC complaints, and contact advertisers to register
Reports of anti-Muslim hate may be filed at:
To learn "How to Challenge Anti-Muslim Hate on the Radio," go to: http://www.cair-net.org/hatehurtsamerica/hatehurtsamerica.asp?page=challengeradio
ACTION REQUESTED: (As always, be POLITE and RESPECTFUL.)
Contact NBC and MSNBC to demand an apology and a reprimand for all those
involved in the program.
Mr. Neal Shapiro
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0002
Mr. Rick Kaplan
1 MSNBC Plaza
Secaucus, NJ 07094-2419
E-MAIL: rick.kap[email protected], [email protected]
COPY TO: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Congressman Lantos attacks Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) treaty as "Treacherous"
CAIR today demanded that Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA) retract and apologize for “deeply disturbing” remarks in a speech to a pro-Israel lobbying group describing a treaty signed by Prophet Muhammad as “treacherous.”
In a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that just came to light, Lantos said:
“So let me sketch for a moment how we in Congress see the last few months. Arafat walked away from a dream deal. Apparently, his approach to the peace process was based on the Treaty of 628 at Hudaibiyah, which was a treacherous treaty. Islamic forces made truce with non-Islamic elements, and they had no intention of keeping that agreement. They went on to attack, and destroyed those with whom they had made the treaty.”
“It is deeply disturbing that an elected official defames the Islamic faith and its final Prophet. This demonstrably false smear on the Prophet Muhammad’s reputation is a common 'talking point’ promoted by the pro-Israel lobby as justification for that state’s brutal and racist policies,” said CAIR Board Chairman Omar Ahmad.
In a letter to Lantos, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad wrote:
“The Prophet Muhammad never broke any agreement, regardless of strength or weakness. There is not one shred of evidence to back up this false allegation. With reference to authorities such as Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Saad, Al-Hakim and Bukhari, the following is an outline of the events surrounding the Treaty of Hudaybiah, the usual basis for this false allegation: 1) The Prophet and his companions were prevented by the pagan Arabs from performing their pilgrimage to Mecca (Umrah). Instead of fighting, and despite the willingness of his followers to enforce their religious rights, the Prophet chose a peaceful settlement. 2) Two years later, the pagan Arabs broke the treaty by attacking and killing 20 allies of the Muslims as they slept. It is internationally recognized that when one party breaks a treaty, the other party is released from its obligations. 3) Even after this attack, no bloody revenge was taken against those who broke the treaty. In fact, when the Muslims finally entered Mecca, amnesty was granted to nearly all former enemies. The Quran states: 'Yes, whoever fulfills his pledge and fears Allah much; verily, then Allah loves those who are the pious.’ 3:76. Also: 'And fulfill (every) covenant.’ 17:34”
In 1996, U.S. News & World Report editor-in-chief Mortimer Zuckerman also claimed the Prophet Muhammad had a “doctrine” of deceit in making treaties with enemies while he was weak and violating them when he was strong. In the magazine's June 24, 1996, issue, this claim was retracted. The editors wrote: “…We deeply regret any ambiguity in the language; Mr. Zuckerman meant no insult. He was referring to Mr. Arafat's reference to the Prophet and did not intend to state that this was the doctrine of the Prophet…it was the Meccans, not the prophet Muhammad, who broke the peace of Hudaybiah of 628.”
In 1999, Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ) clarified similar offensive remarks claiming the Prophet Muhammad upheld terms of a treaty only when it was politically expedient to do so. The clarification came after Saxton’s office received hundreds of faxes, emails and phone calls from concerned Muslims.
Congressman apologizes to Muslims for smearning Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA) has apologized to Muslims for remarks he made in a speech to a pro-Israel lobbying group that described a treaty signed by Prophet Muhammad as “treacherous.” However, he failed to retract his specific allegation about the Prophet’s actions. Lantos’ response came after hundreds of Muslims called, faxed and e-mailed his office to express outrage at his remarks.
In a letter to CAIR, Lantos wrote:
“…let me make very clear that I intended no offense to Muslim believers nor any defamation of the Prophet Muhammad…and I regret any pain caused, however inadvertently. I fully respect Islam as one of the world’s great religions and civilizations and as a faith that provides spiritual comfort and uplift to hundreds of millions…Making a historical judgment on the events of 628-630 A.D. is well beyond my Congressional responsibilities. I had no desire to do so, and, to the extent that I allowed for such an understanding of my intent, I regret it.”
“We thank all those who took the time and effort to express their outrage at these defamatory remarks. May Allah bless them for defending Prophet Muhammad. While Representative Lantos says he had no intent to defame the Prophet Muhammad, he does not clearly retract his false allegation that the Prophet’s actions were 'treacherous,’” said Awad in response to Lantos’ letter. Awad also criticized representatives of the pro-Israel lobby for continuing to promote this slur against the Prophet Muhammad as an anti-Muslim “talking point.” CAIR has requested a meeting with Lantos to discuss a full retraction of his allegations.
Lantos’ offensive remarks, which were made in March but just recently came to light, were included in a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Lantos said: “So let me sketch for a moment how we in Congress see the last few months. Arafat walked away from a dream deal. Apparently, his approach to the peace process was based on the Treaty of 628 at Hudaibiyah, which was a treacherous treaty. Islamic forces made truce with non-Islamic elements, and they had no intention of keeping that agreement. They went on to attack, and destroyed those with whom they had made the treaty.”
In an August 2nd letter to Lantos, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad wrote: “The Prophet Muhammad never broke any agreement, regardless of strength or weakness. There is not one shred of evidence to back up this false allegation…The Quran states: 'Yes, whoever fulfills his pledge and fears Allah much; verily, then Allah loves those who are the pious’…'And fulfill (every) covenant.’”
In 1996, U.S. News & World Report editor-in-chief Mortimer Zuckerman claimed the Prophet Muhammad had a “doctrine” of deceit in making treaties with enemies while he was weak and violating them when he was strong. The magazine’s editors later wrote: “...We deeply regret any ambiguity in the language; Mr. Zuckerman meant no insult. He was referring to Mr. Arafat's reference to the Prophet and did not intend to state that this was the doctrine of the Prophet...it was the Meccans, not the prophet Muhammad, who broke the peace of Hudaybiah of 628.”
In 1999, Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ) clarified similar offensive remarks claiming the Prophet Muhammad upheld terms of a treaty only when it was politically expedient to do so.