IN APRIL President Bush placed a high-risk bet on Israel’s Ariel Sharon. He
delivered, in writing, commitments of U.S. support for Israel’s position on
crucial outstanding issues for a settlement with the Palestinians, on the
prospect that this would spur Mr. Sharon to carry out a proposed Israeli
evacuation of settlements in the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank. Mr.
Bush’s concessions have exacerbated an already parlous U.S. diplomatic
position in the Middle East; Mr. Sharon, meanwhile, has suffered a string
of reverses in his attempt to carry out the withdrawal. The administration
might have responded by reassessing its reliance on a notoriously reckless
leader. Instead, Mr. Bush has doubled up on his bet.

Over the past few days administration officials have let it be known that
they will not object to the recent announcement by Mr. Sharon’s government
of more than 2,000 new housing units in Jewish settlements in the West Bank
— even though official administration policy opposes all such
construction. The new homes are in settlements near Jerusalem and Tel Aviv
that Israel expects to annex in any eventual peace agreement with the
Palestinians — an expectation Mr. Bush publicly supported as part of his
gift package to Mr. Sharon in April. Their high-profile approval by Mr.
Sharon is intended, in part, to split the fierce opposition movement that
now blocks his Gaza plan, thereby raising the chances that the evacuation
can begin as scheduled next year. That withdrawal would be a significant
step toward a Middle East settlement and could help U.S. standing in the

For now, though, the United States will pay the price for its latest
concession to Mr. Sharon, which has been headline news in Israel and around
the Middle East. Once again the Bush administration will be seen as
uncritically supporting a move by Israel to expand settlements regarded by
the rest of the world as illegal, in contradiction to stated U.S. policy
and commitments to allies in Europe and the Middle East. The fact that the
White House has taken this position at a time when Mr. Bush is seeking
support from pro-Israel voters in Florida and other closely contested
states will raise reasonable questions about whether there are any grounds
for his position other than electoral pandering. Administration officials
would say that there are — that they are confident that in the end Mr.
Sharon will deliver. Maybe they are right, but the cost is growing


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.